Browse the newest complete recall records currently stored from FDA enforcement reports and NHTSA vehicle campaigns. “Latest” refers to the newest source-dated record in this database, not the timestamp of our last API check.
64,171published records in database
4recall categories represented
Aug 15, 2018newest stored source record
Latest records
Latest recalls — page 1381
The newest recall records with useful source details are listed here.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
The device and its accessories may not have been manufactured according to current Good Manufacturing Practices. In addition, the firm has received three complaints regarding electric…
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
This lot has incorrectly been laser marked both on the screw head itself as well as the data carrier tag attached to the screw. The description on face two of the screw head and on the data…
Class IIFDA: TerminatedMedtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Class IIFDA: TerminatedHowmedica Osteonics Corp.
Browse by month
Recent recall archives
Browse recent months with enough recall history for useful comparison.