Browse the newest complete recall records currently stored from FDA enforcement reports and NHTSA vehicle campaigns. “Latest” refers to the newest source-dated record in this database, not the timestamp of our last API check.
The newest recall records with useful source details are listed here.
This is a retrospective recall of an instrument used in spine fusion procedures with Modera Modular Pedicle Screw system implants. The firm received a customer complaint in which excessive…
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
Charging base may overheat with localized melting and sparking, possibly causing fire, shock or burns.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
The Neonatal Flow Sensor Cable may be missing the connector housing exposing the wires in the cable.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Natus Neuro has discovered a possible manufacturing defect in the ErgoJust mobile cart that may cause the cart s video pole to fail.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Potential polymer material degradation.
Browse recent months with enough recall history for useful comparison.
