Olympus Ultrasound Endoscope recall — FDA Z-0504-2021
A new inspection step was added to the cleaning and disinfection section of the Instructions For Use (IFU) for this device in order to reduce the risk of causing patient infections.
Overview of recall records associated with Olympus Corporation of the Americas, including dates, categories and classifications where available.
Classification mix: Class II: 217, Class I: 14, Class III: 2.
A new inspection step was added to the cleaning and disinfection section of the Instructions For Use (IFU) for this device in order to reduce the risk of causing patient infections.
The CHF-CB30S Device did not have a 510(k) clearance. Additionally, the device has been associated with breakage of the insertion section and protrusion of metal parts, as well as breakage…
The BF-Q180 bronchoscope is being recalled because it does not have a 510(k) clearance, and the device is associated with a higher rate of patient infections than other comparable OMSC…
Mislabeled outer carton: packaged with the outer carton label stating the contents were the 70143662 Smart Piston but the inside package contents was the 70142158 Stapes Piston; see image…
Mislabeled outer carton: packaged with the outer carton label stating the contents were the 70143662 Smart Piston but the inside package contents was the 70142158 Stapes Piston; see image…
Products repaired with the incorrect service manual may be missing an O ring and are subject to rework with the corrected service manual.
A component of the Olympus ShockPulse Transducer was manufactured with non-conforming material that could allow water ingress during autoclaving sterilization.
Berkeley Disposa-Filter may possess an insufficient ultrasonic weld defect which joins the two-halves of the filter cartridge, thus the housing could separate
There is a potential for the single use suction valve to come apart and/or remain stuck inside the endoscope.
WM-NP/DP2 workstations could become unstable and may fall over if the control panel arm is mounted with a video monitor weighing more than 19.8 pounds.
The adhesive used in the repair of the endoscope was incorrectly prepared. It is unknown what affect the nonconforming adhesive mixture would have on the durability or effectiveness of the…
The adhesive used in the repair of the endoscope was incorrectly prepared. It is unknown what affect the nonconforming adhesive mixture would have on the durability or effectiveness of the…
The adhesive used in the repair of the endoscope was incorrectly prepared. It is unknown what affect the nonconforming adhesive mixture would have on the durability or effectiveness of the…
The adhesive used in the repair of the endoscope was incorrectly prepared. It is unknown what affect the nonconforming adhesive mixture would have on the durability or effectiveness of the…
The attachment of non-Olympus accessories to the bronchoscope s instrument channel port may have resulted in more applied force than expected and lead to loosening of the instrument channel…
Issuance of validated, new reprocessing procedures. This corrective action is being undertaken as a result of ongoing manufacturer and FDA activities relating to reported patient infections…
Olympus has received complaints about fragments of adhesive which detached from inside the working channel of the referenced products. Cracking, chipping, missing pieces, and delamination…
This page summarizes recall records in which the official source identifies Olympus Corporation of the Americas as the recalling firm or manufacturer. The number of records should not be treated as a safety rating or a measure of company size, because recall counts depend on product mix, reporting periods and how government records are organized.
Compare the dates, categories and classifications together rather than relying on the total alone. Open an individual record for the recalled product, reason, distribution details and current instructions available from the source.