Complete FDA and NHTSA recall records dated in 2018, organized for browsing by month, category and recalling company.
Select a month to review the recall records reported during that period.
Records are ordered by the best available source date.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
INOmeters affixed to the INOflo cylinders in Lot 17FP-0570 were programmed with an incorrect expiration date (11/2017). For Lot 17FP-0570, the label affixed to each INOflo cylinder has the…
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
The spreader bar can detach from the scale attachment under certain conditions.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
This is a retrospective recall of an instrument used in spine fusion procedures with Modera Modular Pedicle Screw system implants. The firm received a customer complaint in which excessive…
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
Charging base may overheat with localized melting and sparking, possibly causing fire, shock or burns.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Some devices were labeled as Does not contain DEHP even though the product may contain small amounts of DEHP.
The Neonatal Flow Sensor Cable may be missing the connector housing exposing the wires in the cable.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Natus Neuro has discovered a possible manufacturing defect in the ErgoJust mobile cart that may cause the cart s video pole to fail.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
This archive groups records by their reported or recall date. It does not imply that every recall was initiated, announced and resolved during the same calendar year. Open the individual record for the exact dates and source details supplied by FDA or NHTSA.
