The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
The Stryker Restoration Anatomic Shell (RAS) may fall off its post within its inner packaging which can result in the device loose in the package with coating debris.
Shipments were transported outside of the required refrigerated temperature conditions. Potential hazards if used include nerve damage resulting in paralysis and increased potential for…
Discrepant length; Lot B88751 90mm screws were manufactured with a 100mm length instead of the required 90mm length; lot B90243 100mm screws were manufactured with a 90mm length instead of…
Instead of having a spherical diameter, the probe was observed to have 2 radii and a flat surface. Additionally, upon further investigation, it was observed that some parts exhibited an…
The firm received complaints related to the locking mechanism on the steerable inserter not functioning as intended. The firm confirmed that the issue is related to lack of lubrication of…
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Revision rate identified as higher than other proximal radial head replacement devices based on literature review. Product may not perform at expected level post-surgery.
Class IIFDA: TerminatedHowmedica Osteonics Corp.
Understanding this recall history
This page summarizes recall records in which the official source identifies Howmedica Osteonics Corp. as the recalling firm or manufacturer. The number of records should not be treated as a safety rating or a measure of company size, because recall counts depend on product mix, reporting periods and how government records are organized.
Compare the dates, categories and classifications together rather than relying on the total alone. Open an individual record for the recalled product, reason, distribution details and current instructions available from the source.